In August 2012, Garvagh High School, in the county of Derry, closed due to falling numbers. The school was built in the early 1950s as a result of the education act of 1947, which set out to modernise the aging educational fabric in Northern Ireland, and was the first rural school of that era to be built.
As with many school closures, the school’s death was protracted and painful for the village. Many young people were left facing limited choices with regards viable educational alternatives.
The story since August 2012 is one of a community shifting from anger and loss to investing significant amount of volunteer time to thinking about the long-term potential of the former school building, which backs onto the Garvagh Forest. Since that time the community has been answering three phased questions:
1. Why would we take on this piece of land and listed building?
2. If we did, would it wash its face and for how long?
3. What would it mean to take it on with regards developing skill sets, initial investment, volunteer hours and governance structures?
Over 200 people were involved in attempting to answer question one, which resulted in four scenarios:
Garvagh Enterprise Trust was in essence established to answer question two. With support from Development Trusts Northern Ireland, the Plunkett Foundation and a grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund, we are developing a detailed master plan and business plan. We don’t know yet if we will get to question three. This depends on the final answer to question two.
There have been a number of drivers – and challenges – over the last few years. The drivers of the process have been:
The challenges have tended to be located in the institutional, political and policy landscape. In particular, how long should a community struggle to make the case for what it is trying to do before it receives acknowledgement from key institutional players that this is a worthwhile exploration?
All too often an approach to a statutory body is interpreted as asking for money, whereas we are merely asking for someone to come alongside us and give us the confidence that our process is right and perhaps share some skills and knowledge of the wider scene. Bottom-up development is still ‘abnormal’ in a system where decisions tend to be made on behalf of local people, not with local people.
And the danger of that, as someone once wisely said, is that, ‘if you’re not invited to be at the table, there is the likelihood you might be on the menu’.